Thanks Cad,
your comments/suggestions are much appreciated.
of course you are absolutely correct in what you say about commitment to the cause, and of course that is partly why I am making enquiries...
If the structure and parameters are set, the rules can be applied so much more easily. It is having the initial control that will create the standard from which improvements can be made.
There are a couple of "control freaks" who will be happy to enforce "rules" (and I would stress I am NOT one of them - apart from basic personal responsibility) but everything has to have the start point.
Over the past 18 months I have (with assistance) sorted out a lot of infighting (conflicting agendas from self appointed "gurus"), cleared debt and made sure there is a direction to follow so that a "relaunch" is sustainable.
All "assets" are now central and listed, and expenses/costs have to be approved against monitored income projection (no money is spent unless it is first earned).
The earning of airtime will be dependent on the assessed contribution to the group (there is a "points" system on the shelf - a fundamental part of that is a subscribed nominal membership fee - which will properly capture volunteer longevity

)
One of the biggest challenges for any voluntary group is that there are always people who seem to want projects to fail, which is why if we get the basic "play out" correct in the first instance we can then bring people on in the way you suggest.
My (the) project is a community one, and if the play out function gives scope for developing talent (young and old) from within the community things should begin to take off as originally planned by the group's founder in 2006 (unfortunately deceased in 2008 which kicked off subsequent problems.... but that is another story.....!)
I will give everything you suggest my best shot, although I envisage with my past experience of learning curves I may well be back with variations upon this theme.....
Thanks once again
